Fear is the aphrodisiac in Fiona Kelly McGregor’s new novel The Trap
- Written by The Conversation
Fiona Kelly McGregor’s The Trap follows her successful novel Iris (2022), set in the criminal underworld of Sydney during the Great Depression.
In the previous novel, Iris Webber flees the prison of rural poverty for the dubious opportunities of the metropolis. She becomes a prostitute, but gains a measure of independence. Her irascible charm and plucky passion provide the necessary picaresque armour. Beneath this, her basic worth is never allowed to fully collapse, even as she lives hand-to-mouth and at the mercy of the powerful.
Review: The Trap – Fiona Kelly McGregor (Picador)
In The Trap, we stay in this same historical universe, composed with admirable fidelity to the colour of the historical record. But we have moved forward a decade to 1942. The generalised poverty of the Depression is now inflected with the restrictions brought about by war in the Pacific.
Brownouts and curfews, sly grog and black markets, along with an influx of American military personnel, evoke an atmosphere of Sydney under low-level siege. But what offends the convenience of Sydney’s moneyed stratum is less of a problem to the underclass:
most back streets in Darlo and Surro had always been unlit and business for many was pretty much as usual, in fact it was positively booming, brothels and groggeries buzzing with life till the early hours.
McGregor’s novel delights in this Dickensian world of grifters and chancers, crooked cops and witty hookers. It is a world where street wisdom and schemes prevail over public civility and social policy.
Twisted righteousness
The Trap begins by following Ray Sayles, one of the more memorable side-characters from Iris. In the 1930s, he had gained notoriety for performing as “Ada” in the underground club Black Ada’s. Born in Uganda, then part of British East Africa, Ray’s blackness makes him a striking figure in the white Australia of the time. The beauty of a novel, however, is we do not have to immediately see Ray’s blackness. This allows it to emerge unobtrusively through his encounters.
Plaintively horny
Many of the figures and situations in The Trap, including the the spectacular arrest of McNulty, come directly from the historical record. But this is the kind of historical novel that is based on the enjoyment of an epoch imagined as both more repressive and more sinful than it probably was in reality.
Susan Sheridan noted in her review of Iris that the novel belongs in a literary tradition depicting the lives of the knockabout Sydney poor – a tradition that includes Ruth Park, Kylie Tennant, Catherine Edwards and Dymphna Cusack, as well as Christina Stead and Louis Stone.
The main difference in The Trap is that we are approaching the situation historically, which is to say on the condition of it taking place in a lost past.
What does this past bring us? It must be something we feel to be missing in the present. The curfewed wartime Sydney of The Trap bears some resemblance to the aseptic lockdowns of the Covid era and must draw to some degree on this experience.
But the restrictions of this historicised past come garnished with picturesque historical grime. More than this, what we seem to seek in these dirty pasts are the very things we pride ourselves on having surpassed: daily mortal danger and rampant oppression.
It may seem perverse and counterintuitive, but novels like The Trap are clear on this point. The promotional tagline of this sophisticated work is: “Brutality wore the badge. Bigotry wrote the law.”
In announcing this, the novel is true to the structure of its pleasure, which is powered by this splendid, monstrous persecution. Without the obscene threat posed by Carney and his ilk, the illicit sex in toilets would simply happen. The sensuous excitement of this world, its frisson of fatal excitement, depends entirely on the threat of arrest.
This – and we are speaking about a novel, of course – brings everything up to the requisite pitch. We are told “fear was an aphrodisiac” that “became everyone’s intoxicant”. Everyone was plaintively horny, it seems, because “every night could be your last”. Over and again, we are instructed that the threat is integral to the desire. As the novel puts it:
The fear was always there, sometimes becoming part of the attraction: what must I overcome today, what might I get away with, what will I have to navigate on my descent into the underworld?
It is a strangely exciting world of generalised criminality. Much like the noir universe, minus the paranoia and the femmes fatale. Or like Mad Men, where the awful misogyny and endless scotch and cigarettes simper with mid-century glamour. Aren’t we glad we don’t live there anymore?
